Deep Audit — three models, cross-checked
LiveRun a contract past Anthropic, OpenAI and Google models in parallel, then reconcile the three readings into one report.
- ✓Three model vendors reading the same contract independently
- ✓A reconciliation pass that merges them into one report
- ✓Per-upload choice, so the cost is spent where it matters
- ✓Roughly three times the token cost of a standard analysis
What it is.
Switch a single upload into deep mode and the analysis does not go to one model. Anthropic, OpenAI and Google models each read the contract in parallel, and a reconciler pass merges the three readings into one report — so a finding that only one model saw is visible as exactly that, rather than presented with the same confidence as one all three agreed on.
It costs roughly three times the tokens of a standard analysis and takes longer, which is why it is a per-upload choice rather than the default. Use it on the contracts where being wrong is expensive. An admin can switch the second-opinion vendors off for the whole organisation in AI Administration.
Three steps.
End to end.
A per-upload setting, not an account-wide one. Standard analysis stays the default.
Each vendor's model analyses the contract independently.
A merging pass produces a single cross-checked report rather than three you have to compare yourself.
What you get.
- ✓Three model vendors reading the same contract independently
- ✓A reconciliation pass that merges them into one report
- ✓Per-upload choice, so the cost is spent where it matters
- ✓Roughly three times the token cost of a standard analysis
- ✓All three vendors disclosed in the privacy policy's sub-processor list, and all three hard-disabled in air-gapped deployments
- ✓Second-opinion vendors can be switched off by an admin
Quick answers.
It is more cross-checked, which is not the same claim. Three independent readings surface disagreements a single pass would have hidden; we are not going to put an accuracy percentage on it, because we have not measured one.
Yes. Each vendor's call on this path writes a cost row with the model that answered, so a deep run shows as roughly three times a standard one in the usage view.
More in Review & Risk Analysis.
Three-tier extraction cascade so PDF, DOCX and scanned contracts all work — one accept list for every upload door, and a report page that says which step the analysis is on.
Red, amber, or green for every clause, with an explanation and confidence score.
One organisation-wide number, 0-100, from the parts of your legal position the product can actually read — and "not assessed" for the parts it cannot.
Upload a ZIP of contracts and run the full analysis across all of them in one job.