Clause-level risk scoring
LiveRed, amber, or green for every clause, with an explanation and confidence score.
- ✓Per-clause red/amber/green tags
- ✓Plain-English explanations on every verdict
- ✓A verdict and an evidence span, so you can see which words drove the finding
- ✓A confidence score from 0 to 100 on each verdict
What it is.
Every clause in your contract gets a per-clause risk verdict: red (block / renegotiate), amber (worth a second look), or green (standard). Each verdict includes a plain-English explanation, a confidence score (low / medium / high), and a reference to the relevant provision of the governing law where one applies.
Risk scoring runs over the parsed clauses produced by the scanner. There is no separately trained scoring model — LexVio trains no model. The analysis prompt is assembled with the applicable-law context for the governing law the document resolves to, and where no governing law can be decided, with a jurisdiction-neutral commercial-contract context rather than another country's law.
Three steps.
End to end.
Document parses into clauses. Risk model runs over each clause.
Red/amber/green tag with a sentence-level explanation in plain English.
Click a clause to see the reasoning, the relevant statute, and the fix suggestion.
What you get.
- ✓Per-clause red/amber/green tags
- ✓Plain-English explanations on every verdict
- ✓A verdict and an evidence span, so you can see which words drove the finding
- ✓A confidence score from 0 to 100 on each verdict
- ✓Quoted clause text is checked back against the source document — anything the model could not find there is withheld and reported separately
- ✓References to the governing law where relevant — check a cited provision at the official source
- ✓Filter by risk level for triage on long contracts
Quick answers.
Record the disagreement — clause feedback is captured against the clause. It is not used to train or tune a model, because nothing in the product trains on your content.
It catches a subset — missing clauses, contradictions, definitional gaps. It is a reading of the contract, not a tax or regulatory review of your business.
More in Review & Risk Analysis.
Three-tier extraction cascade so PDF, DOCX and scanned contracts all work — one accept list for every upload door, and a report page that says which step the analysis is on.
One organisation-wide number, 0-100, from the parts of your legal position the product can actually read — and "not assessed" for the parts it cannot.
Upload a ZIP of contracts and run the full analysis across all of them in one job.
Reads the governing-law clause before deciding which law a contract is analysed under — and treats "unknown" as an answer.