← All features
Court Research

Citation graph

Live

See how cases cite each other — trace a doctrine forward and back.

What you get
  • Forward + backward citation chains
  • Distinguished / overruled flags
  • Per-doctrine subgraph filters
  • PNG / PDF export for argument briefs
Overview

What it is.

Every judgment is a node; every citation is an edge. The graph lets you see which earlier cases were cited, which later cases cited this one, and how a doctrine evolved across courts and decades.

Useful for advocates building an argument from precedent, and for partners checking whether a cited case has been distinguished or overruled in a later decision.

How it works

Three steps.
End to end.

01
1. Anchor a case

Open any judgment in the research corpus.

02
2. Expand the graph

Backward to earlier cases this one cited; forward to later cases that cite this one.

03
3. Spot warnings

Cases marked as distinguished, overruled, or per-incuriam are flagged in the graph.

Capabilities

What you get.

  • Forward + backward citation chains
  • Distinguished / overruled flags
  • Per-doctrine subgraph filters
  • PNG / PDF export for argument briefs
FAQ

Quick answers.

How are overruling flags determined?

Combination of automated NLP extraction and editorial review for high-traffic cases. Reach out if you find a missing flag.

Related

More in Court Research.

Court research corpus
Live

Citation-verified judgments and rulings from courts and tribunals across major commercial jurisdictions.

Want to try Citation graph?
Get started in 60 seconds.

Sign up →All features